Mary, Mary, To The Contrary

I read in The New York Times today that Mary Barra pushed back against China’s aggressive plan to ban the sale of gasoline powered automobiles. In her Shanghai speech, she said:

“I think it works best when, instead of mandating, customers are choosing
the technology that meets their needs,”
(1)

Shame, Mary. Shame. Should we permit customers to choose plutonium powered cars because they would only need refueling once every twenty years? Hey, convenient, quiet, zero emissions. I think not. It’s the old critical mass problem. We’ll probably agree that Governments should control that option. But, if you look at the alphabet soup of Climate Change (2) hurricane names in the Caribbean and the mess they have left (or will leave) behind,  you might think a few plutonium bombs had been loosed down there. That’s not the case, of course, but you know, I know you do, that gasoline powered cars are just slow atmospheric time bombs, and the timer has run out.

It certainly does not work best when customers are choosing their own automobile power technology if that choice chokes us in poison gases, fills the atmosphere with CO2, acidifies the ocean, and blows Florida and its neighbors to the south off the map. Your customers are not equipped to sort through the real facts, industrial propaganda, bullshit, and lies that surround matters like these. They’ve been trained well by Detroit and decognified by political evangelists. We need a some real leadership here. Leadership with brains, not what we have in Washington and Florida now.

How about this, let’s use up what gas cars we have for as long as they run, but make no more. Or not many more. It’s past time. Hell, Cuba did it. We can, too! China is right.

Or, maybe we could build a wall around the country to keep hurricanes out, and evolve leaves to breath CO2.

-George-

  1. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/15/business/gm-china-ceo-gasoline.html?hpw&rref=automobiles&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well
  2. In bold and capitalized for Rick Scott, who has trouble seeing or saying those words.

Hot Out There

I’m trying to get back on track. I have really tried to stay away from U. S. politics lately. I tend to “lose it” when I consider the tragic silliness emanating from Washington these days. I mean, what can you say? Nothing. What can you do? A lot, and vote. So, less saying and more doing, and on to the topic of the day.

USA Today reported that Ahvaz, Iran experienced 129 degree temperatures today (1). That may be a record.

I have come to regard internal combustion powered cars I see on the road as principly CO2 generation plants. About 75% of what they do while running is create waste heat, and, of course, the CO2 associated with that process. Something like 25% of the energy used goes into moving the car, and the CO2 related to even that would be bad enough.

This week I went out to buy a pickup truck to use while we are building our new house. I test drove one, a fairly new Chevy Colorado. It was a nice work truck, but in the end, I couldn’t do it. In my mind, I could see over 108 basic 19th century (yep, 19th) parts flailing around inside the engine pumping out CO2 as I would drive it for non-essential purposes.

But, we need two cars. We just passed our Chevy Volt on to a son, and our new Tesla Model 3 won’t be here until late this year, if then. So, I hopped on the CarMax web site and looked for a used Chevrolet Spark EV. Guess what, there are a few (2), all in California, of course. So, I ordered one shipped to Ohio. It’s not a pickup, but it will do all the milk runs. We’ll rent a pickup if we need it. And I think I already have a home for the Spark when the Tesla arrives. Cool on a hot day, I think.

More doing, less saying.

-George-

  1. https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2017/06/29/129-degrees-iran-earths-hottest-temperature-ever-recorded/440644001/#
  2. https://www.carmax.com/cars/chevrolet/spark-ev/

The Three Stooges

When I started this blog I really wanted to be as respectful as I could in any criticisms I made of political action, to stay away from the people involved and to focus upon the acts themselves. But, since November 2016 that has become very, very difficult. I have frequently failed. One can reduce ignorance by supplying information, but stupidity is something else again. One cannot debate complex issues with a stupid person. Reason will not penetrate the cognitive walls built up around a stupid mind, and now we have a government with two stupid minds leading the congress and one leading the executive. We have actually got a real set of Three Stooges (1) running our country, and we can do nothing about that fact in the short-term. So, that’s about all I can say about Trump, Ryan, and McConnell. If I say any more about these people, it might be considered disrespectful.

This blog is about what we can do, not what we cannot. And, of course, Trump’s Paris Climate Agreement withdrawal is what set me off today. Having, like Elon Musk and Bob Iger (2,3), given up on the idea that Trump, Ryan, and McConnell might only be ignorant, needing only some coaching, there is nothing to do but implement the deal ourselves, by states, localities, companies, and individuals.

California is pressing ahead. As Governor Jerry Brown said (4):

. . . the world is not waiting for Donald Trump. He has given a body blow to the cause of environmental sustainability, but we will take it and we will respond. We’re on the field of battle, and we’re going to overcome. That, I can promise you.

And others (5,6,7,8).

Our family is on the field of battle with Jerry Brown. We have already laid the plans for that in the construction of a new Zero Energy Ready home (9). We are now bumping that up to be off-grid capable upon occupation. After a shakedown period, we want to unplug the house. There is no reason not to. We are buying absolutely no more internal combustion engine vehicles. We’ll keep our 2015 CR-V until the wheels fall off or until we are sure we don’t need it, and replace our 2013 Chevy Volt with a Tesla Model 3 in 2018 (reserved). Tesla’s charging network is an important part of the Volt replacement choice. The Volt, by the way, has delivered well over 1000 miles per gallon since we bought it new due to our driving pattern and the 240 volt rapid charger (wind offset) in the garage.

There is a lot we can do without the Stooges (oops, sorry).

-George-

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stooges
  2. http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/01/news/elon-musk-resigns-trump-adviser/index.html
  3. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/paul-ryan-mitch-mcconnell-praise-trumps-move-against-paris-climate-deal/article/2624722
  4. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/gov-jerry-brown-trumps-move-reject-paris-agreement-hurts-america-will-cost-jobs/
  5. http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/02/news/companies/trump-ceo-revolt/index.html
  6. http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/obama-musk-other-world-industry-leaders-call-paris-climate-deal-n767296
  7. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/american-cities-climate-standards.html?hp
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXH2ojr7wi4
  9. A Renewable Energy Project

Going To Mars

I read this morning that NASA has a plan to get to Mars in 20 years. (1) If it takes 20 years, they will probably land at Elon’s third DragonPort and freshen up a bit at the local SpaceX hotel. (2) But that’s not the point. Once on Mars and cleaned up after the long trip, when those intrepid NASA explorers take a Model Y out for a run in the circumplanetary desert they will have no water, no trees, no animals, no oxygen, and a thin CO2 atmosphere in which to suffocate should their breathable air bottles spring leaks.

Which is to say, why bother? Our new EPA chief may be able to recreate this environment on Earth in less than 20 years and save a lot of money.

-George-

  1. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/journey-to-mars-next-steps-20151008_508.pdf
  2. http://www.space.com/34234-spacex-mars-colony-plan-by-the-numbers.html